Sign up
Views voiced on these blogs are not necessarily Amnesty International's own

Subscribe to this blog

People are writing about

Archives

September 2010
MTWTFSS
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Is technology really good for human rights?

Have a look at these two stories, both from the same news website, about the same country, on the same day. The first looks at the much-discussed “Twitter Revolution” in Iran, and discusses how demonstrators were able to use technology – SMS, blogs, Youtube, Twitter – to mobilise demonstrators and expose human rights abuses by the authorities.

The second article looks at the flipside – MEPs issuing a stinging attack on Nokia-Siemens Networks who, they said, supplied technology hardware to the Iranian authorities that was used in the "persecution and arrests of Iranian dissidents".

Technology, particularly Internet and telecommunications technology, provides ‘the good guys’ with new tools to help them do their job: documenting human rights abuses, telling as many people as possible about it, mobilising people to try to stop them. But it also provides ‘the bad guys’ with new tools to do their job too – bugging people’s conversations, snooping on their emails, tracking their location.

Some commentators also question how effective online activism can be. If we’re outraged about a story we read on a blog, how many of us now retweet the story, join a Facebook group and then sit back  and congratulate ourselves for doing something about it? I can say from experience that social networks have proved really helpful in mobilising people who care about an issue – but doesn’t someone then have to translate that community of concern into action in the real world?

It’s these issues that we’ll be debating at an Amnesty event on Monday 22 February, entitled Is technology really good for human rights? We’ve assembled a great panel: Susan Pointer, Google's Director of Public Policy & Government Relations;  Andrew Keen (via video), author of Cult of the Amateur: How the Internet is killing our culture; Kevin Anderson, blogs editor of the Guardian; and Annabelle Sreberny, Professor at the School of Oriental and African Studies with a special interest in Iran, bloggers & social media (see her article here, for example). Rory Cellan-Jones, Technology Correspondent for the BBC, will chair the event.

The audience – it's invitation only I'm afraid, we're short of space – will be largely made up of bloggers and keen social media users, and we'll have interaction from outside the auditorium via Twitter, using the #aitech hashtag. I’m anticipating some lively discussion of Google's role in China, the use of Twitter and other social media in Iran's 'Green Movement', the role that the Internet and social media will play in the forthcoming UK general election, issues around 'citizen journalism', plus a host of other topics. We’ll be live tweeting from the event at @newsfromamnesty.

We’re very keen to have a debate that reaches way outside the auditorium, so if you have a question or a comment, please leave it on this blog or tweet it using #aitech. We’ll put as many of them to the panel as we can. No promises to shut down the Amnesty website if the “No’s” win the evening, though…

Add comment

30 Comments

16th February 2010


By the way, if you'd like to come to the event, let me know. It's invitation-only and filling up fast, but we might be able to squeeze you in (if you ask nicely!)



steve


17th February 2010

Hi Steve

Sounds really interesting….. no chance of me getting to it though (I presume it's in London?)

Do you know if it's going to be recorded?

17th February 2010


@Mike – glad it sounds interesting, I'll see whether it's going to be recorded – I'm afraid it is London, yes.



Certainly some of the contributions will be recorded, and you should be able to follow a lot of it on Twitter – we'll be live tweeting from @newsfromamnesty and people will be pitching in their questions and comments using #aitech





17th February 2010
Communication channels are not neutral conduits to be sure, although it could be an improvement from the broadcast outlets of the past. I feel like this debate has slowed down in the United States, although many of the Patriot Act provisions effecting this remain largely intact.
18th February 2010
If there's any spaces left I'd love to come and hear the debate.
19th February 2010

Hi, i'm a bit late in the day for this i suspect but i don't suppose there are any spaces left? I'm studying a Graphic Design MA in London and one of the topics i'm looking at is the effect of google and the internet on the world, so this discussion would be very interesting and relavent to me.

Many thanks, Chris

19th February 2010


Stephen, Chris – it's filling up fast but I'm sure we'll be able to squeeze you in – send me an email to steve.ballinger@amnesty.org.uk and I'll send you online registration details.


22nd February 2010


hi steve,



i am involve in an internet/tv project that very much deals with the twiter revolution and the iran uprising. is there a chance that today's event is going to be recorded on video, or be posted on the net?



if so, please send me details.



eli cohen – cohenelik@gmail.com


22nd February 2010
If you were really onto it you'd have had a live webcast or webinar along with a recorded podcast for people to download after the event… get with the times! In effect the seminar was limited in its impact by the fact you had to be in London, which makes a mockery of using technology to reach out to the community and engage as wide an audience as possible in human rights. You could learn a lot just from looking at what the Harvard program on IHL is doing in the field of conflict and the Geneva Conventions: there seminars are all easy to access and allow for real time input from the audience, and they're attended by people from all over the globe (online) and in Cambridge, MA. The UK, and AI, is far too London-centric" technology should be changing this, not reinforcing it. I type this from, well, Copenhagen!!!
24th February 2010


Agreed with other comments. There should be always a recorded video this sort of thing. It is not difficult. ;)



The benefits of a mass communications medium surely out weigh the risks and counter measures that can be undertaken by repressive governments.



A key point is that those at risk (human rights workers, activists etc) must have an excellent understanding of the technology they are using and ways to stay safe online. Not only an understanding of the technology but also of the threats, and how to minimise risk.



http://www.rsf.org/spip.php?page=article&id_article=33844



http://info.frontlinedefenders.org/manual/en/esecman/index.html?q=manual/en/esecman/






http://www.ironcove.net





26th February 2010

Hello, I recorded this event- If anyone would like a copy sent over to them via email/ Skype/ Aim

Ursula

26th February 2010
Hi Ursula, I'd appreciate a copy please. How do I securely get my email address over to you? (don't want it open on these pages as spam trawlers will just harvest it). Thanks!! Andy
1st March 2010
Ursula Hi – if possible I'd like a copy too :- @WilliamJames
1st March 2010
Ursula Hi – if possible I'd like a copy too :- @WilliamJames
1st March 2010


As far as I can work out, it's about quality time and getting messages across, that's the internet. If it not doing that, what's the point? The same goes for computers. They're time saving devices. If a conversations going to solve the problem more quickly, perhaps that's the way things should be done. Certainly though. Static web content can be considered in a way that face to face talking may well not be.



For example, in most cases, the internet doesn't hear people scream, shout and cushions their mistakes.


1st March 2010


For good measure, check out my amnesty blog here:



http://blogs.amnesty.org.uk/ORORAW


8th March 2010


Found this an excellent debate – well seemed that way via Twitter. To see a good local group blog see Central Birmingham AI group's one at www.amnestybrum.wordpress.com



Simon, West Mids Regional Rep



www.amnestywestmidlands.wordpress.com


24th May 2010

If you were really onto it you'd have had a live webcast or webinar along with a recorded podcast for people to download after the event… get with the times! In effect the seminar was limited in its impact by the fact you had to be in London, which makes a mockery of using technology to reach out to the community and engage as wide an audience as possible in human rights. You could learn a lot just from looking at what the Harvard program on IHL is doing in the field of conflict and the Geneva Conventions: there seminars are all easy to access and allow for real time input from the audience, and they're attended by people from all over the globe (online) and in Cambridge, MA. The UK, and AI, is far too London-centric" technology should be changing this, not reinforcing it. I type this from, well, Copenhagen!!!

-wlid

http://forum.al-wlid.com

31st August 2010
Some very good arguements!Bradenton Real EstateThanks.
31st August 2010
It is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like them very much. I can feel that you paid much attention to those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing. free web hosting

31st August 2010
It is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like them very much. I can feel that you paid much attention to those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing. free web hosting

31st August 2010
It is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like them very much. I can feel that you paid much attention to those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing. free web hosting

31st August 2010
It is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like them very much. I can feel that you paid much attention to those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing. free web hosting

31st August 2010
It is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like them very much. I can feel that you paid much attention to those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing. free web hosting

31st August 2010
It is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like them very much. I can feel that you paid much attention to those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing. free web hosting

31st August 2010
It is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like them very much. I can feel that you paid much attention to those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing. free web hosting

31st August 2010
It is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like them very much. I can feel that you paid much attention to those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing. free web hosting

31st August 2010
It is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like them very much. I can feel that you paid much attention to those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing. free web hosting

31st August 2010
It is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like them very much. I can feel that you paid much attention to those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing. free web hosting

31st August 2010
It is my great pleasure to visit your website and to enjoy your excellent post here. I like them very much. I can feel that you paid much attention to those articles, as all of them make sense and are very useful. Thanks so much for sharing.

Add a comment

Name:
E-mail:

To add a link first highlight text

Enter the validation code displayed above:

Note that by submitting your comments you agree to respect our house rules.