Sign up
Views voiced on these blogs are not necessarily Amnesty International's own

Subscribe to this blog

Archives

February 2010
MTWTFSS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

China’s broken Olympic promises

Jailed activist Hu Jia, his wife and their baby.
Jailed activist Hu Jia, his wife and their baby.

Today marks the start of the ten-day countdown to the Olympic Games in Beijing and Amnesty has been studying the Chinese authorities’ human rights performance very carefully since they won the right to host the Games back in 2001. We haven’t liked what we’ve seen.

The Chinese government promised that the Olympics would help bring human rights to China. Wang Wei, Secretary General of the Beijing Olympic Bid Committee, said in 2001: “We will give the media complete freedom to report when they come to China. (…) We are confident that the Games coming to China not only promotes our economy but also enhances all social conditions, including education, health and human rights.”

But what we’ve seen is increasing repression. In preparation for the Games, the Chinese authorities have locked up, put under house arrest and forcibly removed individuals they believe may threaten the image of ‘stability’ and ‘harmony’ they want to present to the world. 

Our new report, “The Olympics Countdown: Broken Promises,” evaluates the performance of the Chinese authorities in four areas related to the core values of the Olympics: persecution of human rights activists, detention without trial, media censorship and the death penalty. You can find out more about the report here.

Local activists and journalists working on human rights issues in China are at particular risk of abuse during the Games. Human rights activist and writer Hu Jia is still serving a three-and-a-half year sentence for “inciting subversion” by writing about human rights and giving interviews to foreign media. Hu Jia suffers from liver disease due to a Hepatitis B infection but the authorities have prevented his family from taking him medicine. You can take action for him here. Other activists from outside the capital have been told not to go to Beijing in August.

The Chinese authorities have responded, accusing Amnesty of “wearing tinted glasses” (?) and failing to be objective. We’d love to have a dialogue with them about any areas where they feel Amnesty hasn’t been objective. Our report highlights the one area where they may have been some improvement, in a possible reduction in the use of the death penalty  – but as execution figures remain a state secret, it’s hard to verify (objectively). They could start by unblocking our website in China (you can’t even access it in the Olympics media area, reportedly) and allowing us access to the country.
 
Amnesty also releases False Start today, the last (and best, in my view) of our hard-hitting, animated viral films. It highlights the persecution of people who speak up for human rights in China, depicting a cartoon Olympic protester being shot by a Chinese security official. You can see it here.

We’ve also launched a new website – In both English and Chinese – called The China Debate (www.thechinadebate.org) which aims to raise awareness of human rights violations in China and promote a balanced debate on how improvements can be achieved.

Add comment

1 Comment

31st July 2008


It is laughable that you've published a report saying that the human rights situation in China is deteriorating.



There must be only one word in your dictionary regarding China. Oh, we may find another word for back up, worsen.



However, is that true? Or is that even possible?



Let me use a simple mathematical calculation to show you how ridiculous your so-called reports can be.



Since 1989, AI's reports about China have a common word in them, ‘deteriorating'. Let's say in a more conservative way that China's human rights situation worsens 10% on a annual basis. I bet most of you would put a much high figure instead.



Well, the assumption is the human rights of China in 1989 were 1, or (100%). The human right situation in 2008 would be (100%-10%)^19, which equals to 13.5%. which means today's human rights situation in China is only 13.5% of that in 1989.



Apparently, Chinese people are not that smart, since our human rights situation is only 13.5% of that in 1989, how come we don't follow the ‘human rights fighters' from the West to get what we deserve? The simple answer would be: your reports are nothing but lies.



Everyone with common sense and have been to China before, would tell you that your report is fundamentally flawed and full of crap.


Add a comment

Name:
E-mail:

To add a link first highlight text

Enter the validation code displayed above:

Note that by submitting your comments you agree to respect our house rules.